12 Most Convincing Reasons to Opt Your Child Out of Standardized Testing
You’ve heard the stories. Teacher firings! School closures! Children being left behind! All based on the results of a one-day, one-size-fits-all test. Not only are these tests inaccurate and ineffective measures of school, teacher, and student success, they are also literally hurting children. This is no surprise to parents who are catching on to the fact that something is just not right when it comes to standardized tests.
Today more and more parents are waking up and uniting to opt out of a multi-billion dollar industry that is not only robbing our children of resources and valuable learning time, in many cases it is causing both physical and mental illness. For the sake of our children, it is time to take back the learning and join other pioneering parents that are opting children out of standardized tests in an effort to not only save our schools, but MOST importantly save our children.
Here are the 12 most convincing reasons in support of opting your child out of standardized testing.
1. They don’t help your child
Despite the fact that schools have chosen to group young people by date of manufacture, the reality is that they are individuals that naturally develop at different rates. This does not mean they need to be labeled or classified as gifted or special. It just means that some young people are learning different things, at different times, and in different ways than others. A good teacher can help your child learn at a pace and with material that is right for him or her. A standardized test is not required or even helpful in providing this for your child.
2. They are poor measure of teacher or school effectiveness
In places like New York City teacher assessment is being heavily correlated to student test scores even though the test makers themselves say they are a poor measure of performance. The reality is that there are so many factors that contribute to a child’s test score that it is not only irresponsible to align a teacher performance to such a score but it is also detrimental to a child who may be forced to learn something before they are developmentally ready. Factors outside the teacher’s control heavily influence test performance including parental involvement, socio economic status, special needs the child may have, parent’s education level, the child’s developmental level, the parents speak English in the home, and more. Rather than assess teacher effectiveness or schools, standardized tests more accurately assess what children bring to the table — factors that are outside a teacher’s control.
“We are so test-obsessed that schools are being closed based on test scores, even when those test scores reflect that the schools have a heavy enrollment of very poor kids or heavy enrollment of children with disabilities and children with all kinds of other needs. We don’t look at the needs. We don’t evaluate the problems that need to be solved in that school. We just say “These are low scores. We have to close the school.” ~ Diane Ravitch
3. They make school dull
Not only is preparing for and assessing one’s ability to memorize and regurgitate boring, in the age of instant access to information, it is just no longer a very useful skill. When we make kids fill in bubbles and work to help them be good at that, we are robbing them of exciting learning opportunities to do things that they care about and matter.
4. They aren’t helping prepare children for success in the modern world
Standardized tests are completely disconnected from assessing what matters in the world in which we are supposed to be preparing young people. In the real world accessing technology and tapping into your personal learning network are essential skills necessary to effectively complete tasks. In the world of standardized testing, not only are these things not allowed, they are considered cheating. What’s worse, because standardized tests don’t allow technology or connecting with those in your personal learning network, they are often not allowed or their use is minimized in school. After all, success on a test does not require these real world tools and skills and in fact their use can distract students whose passions may go beyond multiple choice tests from filling in the correct dot.
Not only do these tests keep students stuck in the past, they are irrelevant to what is important or even how we’re assessed in the real world. Ask anyone who lives in the real world and you will find that successful professionals rarely measure success by tests in life. If school life is preparing children for real life, assessments should be designed according to the types of assessments that matter in real life.
6. They don’t measure what’s important for student achievement.
Everyone knows that filling in bubbles is not an effective way to adequately measure knowledge or assess what people can do when it comes to tasks needed for real-world success. Unfortunately, in the mass-production model of school, that doesn’t matter. It is the easiest way to measure a huge number of students. What’s even more interesting is that in many states it is well known that tests don’t measure what is important. In fact if you visit this site from PBS you’ll discover that in many states not only do standardized tests not measure what is important, they are also not even aligned to the standards.
7. They are a horrific waste of money
While testing around the country had been on the rise for decades, No Child Left Behind tripled it. “The amount of testing that was being done mushroomed,” says Kathy Mickey, a senior education analyst at Simba Information. “Every state had new contracts. There was a lot of spending.” The companies that create and score tests saw profits skyrocket. In 2009, K-12 testing was estimated to be a $2.7 billion industry. [source]
Instead of spending billions of dollars on funding testing this money could go toward providing resources for children or lowering class size. Let the teachers do what they were trained to do — teach and assess. Keep big business out of the equation. Keep the billions of dollars out of the pockets of publishers and let it remain in the classroom.
8. They cause anxiety and stress
Esther Bolton, a former teacher of more than a decade from Europe and memberParents and Kids Against Standardized Tests says she’s never seen anything like this. She explained that, “Standardized tests in England were every three years and always marked by teachers. I lived and taught in Switzerland too. No standardized tests at all. We just used continual assessment done by the teachers.” She says, “Here in the states I’ve seen the stress and anxiety resulting from tests in my own kids and the children of friends. One child threw up all over their test paper at my child’s school because they were in such a state. Another child was in tears two nights ago as the teacher has started counting down till test week. My own son has reading difficulties. He reads very slowly and has an IEP. Most children completed the reading test in an hour. He took two hours. All the children had to wait for him putting him in a horribly stressful and embarrassing position.”
9. They can make your child sick
Parents like Gretchen Hererra know all too well how sick standardized testing can make young people. Despite the fact that she had a doctor’s note warning the school that testing would make her child sick, the school forced her son to take the test or be kicked out of school. True to the doctor’s warning, her son Anthony came in for the test and got very ill, having to be rushed to the doctor’s office. Not wanting to subject her child to severe illness, Ms. Hererra opted her son out of the test with a doctor’s note. Valuing test scores more than a child’s well-being,the school kicked Anthony out. He is now enjoying a more peaceful, happy and productive life without school.
10. They are not helpful to teachers
Standardized tests are not designed to help teachers. They provide little information beyond a single number. Educators are provided with extensive training and professional development on effective assessment measures. Filling in someone else’s multiple choice test is not among the most effective means to assess and guide a student. Knowing how a child’s strengths, learning style, how they think, etc are not considered in such tests but are necessary for effectively supporting student learning.
11. Tech savvy students are penalized
Open-ended Language Arts items that require students to generate responses using paper and pencil severely underestimate the achievement of students accustomed to writing using a computer. Combining the effects found in this study with those found in a prior study, this article estimates that students accustomed to writing using a computer under-perform on the standardized Language Arts test by four to eight points on an eighty point scale. This article concludes by recommending that state testing programs that employ open-ended items in Language Arts provide students with the option of composing responses on paper or on computer. [Source: Effects of Computer Versus Paper Administration of a State-Mandated Writing Assessment. Read the results of the study here.]
12. They are unfair to children with special needs and children whose first language is not English
Most citizens who are concerned about education have heard about the incredible success Finland has had with its educational system. This has been measured in part by scores on an international test. One huge difference though between a place like Finland and the United States is that they have few students who are being tested in their non-native language. In the United States however, students are tested in English regardless of whether this is their native language. As a result, students are being inaccurately assessed because of a language barrier rather than lack of knowledge.
Parents across the nation are fed up with a government that is sucking data out of our children like a vampire needing their blood to survive. For many the jig is up. Parents have caught on to the fact that not only does all this ineffective, inaccurate, and outdated testing and prepping do nothing to help their children, but the reality is that it is harming them. Schools are literally turning parent’s once vibrant, playful, smart, and creative young treasures into student zombies who must memorize, regurgitate, and do what they’re told.
Fortunately, the social-media marketplace of the 21st century does not have to apply solely to consumer outrage against banks and phone companies. Parents can come together to stand up and unite against the government’s attempt to control their children, by getting and sharing information and uniting with others to opt out of testing. If this applies to you, there are two things you can do now to get started:
Seek more information: Opt Out of Standardized State Tests Site With the help of wonderful students, educators, and parents, there is an “Opt Out of State Standardized Tests” site where anyone can find and contribute information as they find it. Join here.
Join your state’s Opt Out of Standardized State Test Group Concerned educators and parents have come together to create brand-new, easy-to-find, state-by-state groups on Facebook where parents, educators, and anyone who cares, can come together to mobilize and take back control of their children’s freedom to learn. You can join others interested in opting out in your state in two ways:
When learning is customized to the child rather than standardized to the system, exciting possibilities await. When passion, not just tests, can drive the learning, what learning might start to take shape in our schools and communities across our nation? What will happen when we give young people the freedom to learn, explore, discover and create in ways that go far beyond the memorization and regurgitation of facts onto bubble sheets? What will young people do once they have an opportunity to step up and take back ownership of their learning? What could your child accomplish when the billions of wasted testing dollars are redirected toward students?